It’s been a long time but finally I’m back!
A lot’s happened in the past half year or so that’s kept me pretty occupied but I’ve finally managed to find some time to sit down and restart this whole project. That was about a month ago… But I’ve seriously spent that month thinking and mulling over this project.
So I’ve decided I don’t like what I’ve done so far and I’m going to need to make some changes. First things first I’m splitting the site in two. The first part is the Blog (seriously WordPress doesn’t recognise the word blog?). I’m going to reserve this for opinionated stuff and interesting facts! I might also divert it to explain the latest science news or clear up some questions anyone has. I’ll sort that out as I go along.
The second half is the more serious. That is going to be the pages, here I’m going to start work on making a free resource which is referenced and (hopefully) reliable that explains all aspects of science from the most basic level to the highest, much the same as I wanted to do before, but this time with more structure to make it navigable. The second half I’m sure most people will realise is going to take a hell of a lot more work.
Part of this is to make things easier and more directed, but it’s also to make the whole thing a bit more fun and interesting. The blog I hope will be less boring and something people might want in their rss feed, whereas the pages are just something to refer to in times of need!
Other than that I might be making a few style changes and maybe some interactive stuff, if I get really ambitious (and have way too much time) I may even incorporate some animations. We will see how it goes and your feedback, as always, is welcome!
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 20/10/2012
Let’s get this straight from the off. You don’t see nearly as much as you think you do. In fact you barely see anything. You may think this is an exaggeration but I’m being serious. And I’ll explain why.
Before we start you should read the first post in this series.
Firstly you don’t see smooth motions in the world around you. The neurons in your eyes can’t work that fast (more…)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 12/02/2012
I’ve had to break this post down into two posts as it got a bit long.
So before I start on this bit I want everyone reading to take part in a very small experiment:
Put a hand over your left eye so you can’t see anything with it. Now lean back from the computer screen and stare at the cross on the left in the image below.
As you stare at the cross, move closer to the image (you can get pretty close).
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 12/02/2012
I’m tempted to copy and paste EvoAnth‘s post (or just reblog it) to make my life easier, but no I might as well do this properly!
I’ve never been completely sure how much worth these awards seem to hold, although I have seen a couple floating around in the blogosphere. Chain blogging isn’t the most attractive of things to do… and I’m sure it doesn’t take a huge amount of work to win one, but people have put effort into sharing, and it’s nice to be recognised by a fellow blogger, so I might as well do the same.
So these are the guidelines:
• Nominate 15 other bloggers
• Inform your nominees
• Share 7 random facts about myself
• Thank the one who nominated you
• Add a picture of the award to this post
Let’s see how well I stick to them. I don’t know if I’m allowed to nominate people that the person who nominated me nominated (lots of nominates…). But I happen to agree with a few of his choices so I might add them if I run out of ideas!
I’ll just quickly add the photo:
Next I would like to thank EvoAnth who, like me, is also a versatile blogger. The recognition is greatly appreciated. And I am also thankful for the posting of my blog URL twice on his award post. If you didn’t mean to do it, you can keep it up there. I don’t mind :).
OK my nominees are:
Two bloggers who have interesting philosophies on how the world works, or should work. Well worth a read:
A couple of science bloggers who give an amusing, but accurate, outlook into the life of a scientist:
Some more science based blogs:
Science and Religion:
And I’m going to steal two from my nominators nominees:
- Eye on the ICR – Creationist angst, which many will sympathise with, many will disagree with
- Simian rivalry – two bloggers who hold completely different perspectives over science and religion battling it out over wordpress.
There! 15 blogs nominated. Sorry if some of it comes out in a weirdly small font, WordPress is acting up a bit today for me.
Now the 7 random facts:
- I play the piano.
- I was in Turkey when this earthquake hit.
- I have a slight fascination with all things developmental (especially neuro and psycho).
- I have eaten coco pops all my life and still have it almost every day.
- I am a lifetime member of the Beano (despite my parents begging me not to make such a commitment as a child).
- I’ve been reading a series of Sci-Fi fantasy books by Robert Jordan (the wheel of time) since I was 13. It’s over 10,000 pages long and the guy died before finishing it. so 8 years later I’m still waiting for the final book to come out…
- Final random point, and probably the most awesome/scary/crazy thing in my opinion: I’m going to have a son in a few months!
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 09/02/2012
The picture I’ve put up is one of a mouse retina. The green dots are cells that have been stained with a fluorescent dye. I’m showing you this partly to show you how many cells there are in a retina (only some of the cells are stained, and humans have even more than mice). It’s also partly to (more…)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 08/02/2012
Before I start I’m going to give you a couple of references to some relevant posts I have already made/reblogged:
The basics of sensory science
The causes of sensation – very relevant to this post
A reblogged think on colours and some other issues
If anyone still wants to they can vote in the poll on the sidebar!
OK let’s get started. (more…)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 06/02/2012
I was originally going to start posting on the actual senses with vision, but this is a far better way to go about it!
I’ve had a couple comments on patterns of activity defining the senses. I’m going to use our sense of touch to point out that it isn’t really the patterns of activity that define a sense, but where that activity comes from, and where it goes to.
He's not a freak! He's a Homunculus...
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 31/01/2012
How would you define time?
Google defines it as (more…)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 29/01/2012
I’ve added a new poll in the sidebar so people can vote for their favourite sense.
I thought it might be interesting to see which ones people can’t live without. (bear in mind all those who live without some of these senses already)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 27/01/2012
Here’s probably the most basic question in all of sensory neuroscience (the study of the senses). How does a ray of light enter our nervous system, to eventually become something that we see? How in fact does anything external (anything we touch, smell, taste, hear or see) get turned into something internal (some kind of signal in the brain that tells us to sense something).
The answer is simple, so simple in fact that it is one word: (more…)
Posted by Nick Sarbiscuit on 26/01/2012